Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Adrian Likins wrote:
Hrm. Is the config enough? How small are these groups? If we go with
a DB, anything that SQLAlchemy can use would be fine with me. That way
when func gets big and needs a REAL DB it would be easier to switch
and not have to gut a lot of code.
Ugh. What do we forsee func needing a REAL DB for? I'd like to
avoid that at pretty much any cost.
I foresee applications built *on top of* Func that may require this. But
if you need a real DB *inside of* Func, you've made a mistake, in my
estimation.
func should be like rpm should have been. Central to many great
applications, but as simple as it can be. :)
--g
Now this I can agree with. Effectively making func the core or foundation
with which I build my application on top of.
NOTE: so this is what discussions are like.
--
jesus m. rodriguez | jesusr@xxxxxxxxxx
sr. software engineer | irc: zeus
red hat network | 919.754.4413 x44413
+-------------------------------------------+
| "Those who cannot learn from history |
| are doomed to repeat it." |
| -- George Santayana |
+-------------------------------------------+
_______________________________________________
Func-list mailing list
Func-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/func-list
