On 1/13/08, Michael DeHaan <mdehaan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > > > > I wonder if it's time to consider adding ssh-based key management to > > the ssl-based key management. > > > > Patches accepted? The reasons for doing it via SSL certs versus SSH are > the raisson de etre [sic] for Func. > However, if someone comes up with a nice side-by-side implementation, I > think that's fair game. > > > whereas *no one* has a decent system for managing ssl keys. > > Actually, we do :) > > I would argue the converse ... that no one really has a good system for > SSH key deployment. That is pain, > which is why Func is so nice. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Func-list mailing list > Func-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/func-list > Personally it seems that if someone is using ssh keys they will just use ssh instead of func with their own home grown scripts. -- "An organisation that treats its programmers as morons will soon have programmers that are willing and able to act like morons only." -Bjarne Stroustrup _______________________________________________ Func-list mailing list Func-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/func-list
