On 2010-05-27 08:47:28 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:44:02AM -0500, Sijis Aviles wrote: > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Sijis Aviles <sijis.aviles@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I'm all for this. I think the changes are great. > > > +1 > > > > > > A quick thought about that architecture tab would be replacing it with an advanced tab, which would include the stuff in get-fedora-all. We can discuss this further. > > > > > > One question - what would we do about the older releases? > > > > > > Sijis > > > > > > > I just looked at the patch and it answers the older release question. > > > > The one thing i did notice was there were a few links to > > "http://localhost:5000/get-fedora-all";. Those should probably be > > changed to "${lang}/get-fedora-all". > > Don't we use "./get-fedora-all"? That should land in the correct > language for everyohne. We usually use paths relative to /, so the correct convention would be: ${path}/${lang}/get-fedora-all We should probably do a check of the current site to make sure we are consistent with this. Thanks, Ricky
Attachment:
pgpdWzpdCgCBs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- websites mailing list websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
