Re: More proposed get.fpo adjustments, based on user feedback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:44:02AM -0500, Sijis Aviles wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Sijis Aviles <sijis.aviles@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'm all for this. I think the changes are great.
> > +1
> >
> > A quick thought about that architecture tab would be replacing it with an advanced tab, which would include the stuff in get-fedora-all. We can discuss this further.
> >
> > One question - what would we do about the older releases?
> >
> > Sijis
> >
> 
> I just looked at the patch and it answers the older release question.
> 
> The one thing i did notice was there were a few links to
> "http://localhost:5000/get-fedora-all";. Those should probably be
> changed to "${lang}/get-fedora-all".

Don't we use "./get-fedora-all"?  That should land in the correct
language for everyohne.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
          Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com
-- 
websites mailing list
websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux