On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Nick Bebout <nick@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My proposal would be to: > > 1. Create a "gitweb" group and use this as the commit group for our > websites, and use "web" as a tracking group for people. (Since we want to > make sure people know how things work, and have generally proven > themselves before we give them access to commit to the live websites). > > or > > 2. Split up commit access to each of the main websites separately, and > have git-web-talk, git-web-fpo git-web-start, etc groups, (Which I don't > know is necessary yet). > > The discussion I've heard so far is basically something similar to 1, and > to make the list of members of gitweb be the people who have committed > within X amount of time (or people who respond to a ping indicating they > are still interested in contributing (since web has a lot of members at > the moment who are not really active). > > I'll volunteer to do most of the work of creating the new group and > changing what group has access to commit (I'm a member of sysadmin-hosted > so I can change the group on hosted01) and adding the members for the new > group. > > Nick > > > -- > websites mailing list > websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites > Nick, 1 - Yes, we are going to be moving the web group as a tracking group. In fact, I was going to send a message about it today. So, in short, we will copy everyone that has made any commits to the fedora-web git repo onto the gitfedora-web group and keep admin/sponsor rights intact. The plan is to make this change in the next week or so. 2 - I think that this is a good idea. I personally like to do this, however, i do not think our group is big enough to warrant just a split just yet. I think this is something more long term as our group grows. Sijis -- websites mailing list websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
