My proposal would be to: 1. Create a "gitweb" group and use this as the commit group for our websites, and use "web" as a tracking group for people. (Since we want to make sure people know how things work, and have generally proven themselves before we give them access to commit to the live websites). or 2. Split up commit access to each of the main websites separately, and have git-web-talk, git-web-fpo git-web-start, etc groups, (Which I don't know is necessary yet). The discussion I've heard so far is basically something similar to 1, and to make the list of members of gitweb be the people who have committed within X amount of time (or people who respond to a ping indicating they are still interested in contributing (since web has a lot of members at the moment who are not really active). I'll volunteer to do most of the work of creating the new group and changing what group has access to commit (I'm a member of sysadmin-hosted so I can change the group on hosted01) and adding the members for the new group. Nick -- websites mailing list websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
