Re: jpg vs png

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 23 May 2007, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>
> Yeh, I did! With PNG crush I got the Inkscape-exported, 58KB png down to
> 48KB and I couldn't squeeze it down anymore. :(
>
> The image (the (FC6 banner in the upper left) has a lot of gradients and
> JPG compression would look a lot better for the size it's at now (~10k).
> The previous version which was a jpg was only ~7k. I think there is some
> way to squeeze PNGs down though for photographic/gradient artwork, but,
> none of the FOSS tools I can find seem to do it. :(
>

Since JPEG is lossy and PNG is not, JPEG has a bit of an advantage in reducing 
image sizes.  As was already pointed out, reducing bit depth helps.  If you 
haven't already, give optipng a try.  It's in our repositories.  :-)

-- 
Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes
nman64@xxxxxxxxx

http://n-man.com/

LinkedIn:
http://linkedin.com/in/nman64

Have I been helpful?  Rate my assistance!
http://rate.affero.net/nman64/
-- 

Attachment: pgp8T6vulqHTX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux