Re: jpg vs png

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 24 May 2007, Karsten Wade wrote:

On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 11:03 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
The image (the (FC6 banner in the upper left) has a lot of gradients and
JPG compression would look a lot better for the size it's at now (~10k).
The previous version which was a jpg was only ~7k. I think there is some
way to squeeze PNGs down though for photographic/gradient artwork, but,
none of the FOSS tools I can find seem to do it. :(

Considering everything:

... wanting a small page that loads quickly
... wanting graphics that look nice
... wanting to adhere to standards of freedom

Let's use JPEG and be happy we can.

JPEG is a lossy in this case, I do not agree it looks nice.:) It's good for high resolution photos bud not for shaped graphics. If you have a source in lossles format then png is the best quality/size option.. I'm very unpleased about fedora logo on wiki front page as it has ugly yellowish shadows = JPG. Just check it with pipete in gimp wherether its white or not.


- Karsten
--

Adam Pribyl

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux