O/H Paul W. Frields έγραψε: > On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 01:09 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: >> On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 13:30 -0400, Warren Togami wrote: >> >>> From what I can gather, Plone is installed and running, but it is >>> currently not widely used by Fedora for several big reasons: >>> >>> - It is questioned whether Plone is needed at all. >> What is the question here? This is the first I've heard about this. >> AFAIC, the issue of "do we need a CMS" is long ago settled. > > Yeah, that's news to me too. We on Docs team definitely need it, we > just don't have anyone in our subproject who can make it do the things > we want. A glance at the archives will show up several instances where > I asked for help with this, but I'm sure it's not as high a priority as > other things like the buildsystem. I even tried to get some personnel > resources from outside the Red Hat walls -- a contributor who I met at > the Summit who said he had a person with the requisite skills. No word > back, so I suppose I should try him again. > > It's one thing to simply install a CMS and put it on a web server. We > have lots of people who can do that. It's quite another to actually USE > one effectively to build a workflow and deploy the tools contributors > need. +1. The CMS installation's priority should definitely be increased. As Paul said, we on docs team definitely need it. It may require a considerable amount of work, but it's a "do it once, enjoy it's fruits for a long time" work. -dim -- Dimitris Glezos Jabber ID: glezos@xxxxxxxxxx, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B http://dimitris.glezos.com/ "He who gives up functionality for ease of use loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous) --
