On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 01:09 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: > On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 13:30 -0400, Warren Togami wrote: > > > From what I can gather, Plone is installed and running, but it is > > currently not widely used by Fedora for several big reasons: > > > > - It is questioned whether Plone is needed at all. > > What is the question here? This is the first I've heard about this. > AFAIC, the issue of "do we need a CMS" is long ago settled. Yeah, that's news to me too. We on Docs team definitely need it, we just don't have anyone in our subproject who can make it do the things we want. A glance at the archives will show up several instances where I asked for help with this, but I'm sure it's not as high a priority as other things like the buildsystem. I even tried to get some personnel resources from outside the Red Hat walls -- a contributor who I met at the Summit who said he had a person with the requisite skills. No word back, so I suppose I should try him again. It's one thing to simply install a CMS and put it on a web server. We have lots of people who can do that. It's quite another to actually USE one effectively to build a workflow and deploy the tools contributors need. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board Fedora Docs Project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
