Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31/10/24 09:25, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 10/30/2024 03:46 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
although having said that I also get annoyed if I have to read through multiple mail threads to get the full context of what the reply is addressing, and in my view it is bad mail etiquette to not include that context

Yes, you include enough text to maintain context, but only what's relevant for that.

> Just on the etiquette front, every organisation I have worked in
> consider it bad email etiquette to not top post replies, so what are
> the reasons for this mail list to be averse to that methodology (just
> curious).

Most people prefer to read things in chronological order, with the question first, followed by the answer.  Top posting reverses that. Office workers file things with the most recent paper in front, so they're used to reverse chronological order, but the rest of us don't like it.  And if you read the list guidelines, you'll see that they tell you not to top post.
Yes, I understand the list guidelines specify to not top post, which I follow, I was just curious as to why.
I've been in the situation when directing multiple questions to a specific person in an email, that person put his responses after each question in a different colour so that they stood out, which is fine.
I've also been in the situation where the mail recipient top posted the responses to the questions with each response numbered to match the order of the questions, which is also fine.
In my 46 year career, the last 18 months is the only time an organisation has used Microsoft Outlook, all the rest of the time the organisations used Domino/Lotus Notes, which I have always considered to be far superior to Exchange/Outlook. The only reason the current organisation is using Outlook is because they are moving to a number of Microsoft applications in the cloud.

regards,
Steve


Attachment: OpenPGP_0x1EBE7C07B0F7242C.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux