Re: Update failed: gstreamer1-plugins-ugly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/29/23 07:02, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 4:02 AM Samuel Sieb <samuel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 12/29/23 00:52, Frank Elsner via users wrote:
How can I solve this problem?

Error: Transaction test error:
    file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstasf.so from install of gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.22.8-2.fc39.x86_64 conflicts with file from package gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1:1.22.7-1.fc39.x86_64

This is not the only file involved in this gstreamer1 update.

It appears that Fedora packagers have made changes to the gstreamer
plugin packages without coordinating with rpmfusion.

Does Fedora have a requirement and process to provide a "heads up" to
other projects, like RPMFusion?

For Fedora, I know an updated package will go to testing, and if all
is Ok, then to release in about a week. Is there a hook in the flow to
inform projects like RPMFusion that a change is taking place, and they
should build, test and prepare to release new binaries? And is a week
enough time for RPMFusion to trigger a rebuild and detect/fix a
problem?

I wonder what's
going on lately.  Earlier it was vlc.

It happens with every system-upgrade, too. It is often the graphic
drivers that break. At a system upgrade (like F38 -> F39), the mailing
lists, message boards and Reddit see a lot of traffic due to breaks.
And the fix for users is to wait a week or so until RPMFusion updates
things.

It seems like (to me) lack of communication or coordination between
Fedora and RPMFusion is one of the root causes of the breaks.

I should have checked before making a comment like that. I don't know about the vlc thing, but this change was coordinated. There is just a timing difference between rpmfusion and fedora repos. There are builds available, you can probably get them by enabling the testing repo.

The NVidia drivers just have a lot of problems in general. akmods help, but kernel changes break them regularly. That's the price you pay for using proprietary drivers.
--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux