On 2023-07-09 23:39, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 7/9/23 22:45, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2023-07-09 18:01, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 7/9/23 13:03, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 7/9/23 03:52, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
9005 came from upstream and Fedora repo not removing
their garbage when when dnf remove was issued, which
is the second bug.
How is this anything to do with the Fedora repo when that file came
from a third-party something?
The file should have not been used to create the
links. The links should have been created based
on the reviion of libvirtd
Why not? That's exactly what ldconfig does. It creates links to the
latest version of the library. There's an ldconfig systemd unit that
runs at boot to fix things up if necessary.
So if the remove script in the rpm does not
remove old files, ldconfig will link to them
if the leftover stuff is higher revision.
So this is a bug in the rpm uninstaller
script
There shouldn't be an uninstaller script for that. If the package
claims the file, it should be removed on uninstall by rpm, so I have no
idea why it would get left behind unless it wasn't a proper rpm file and
installed files outside of rpm's control.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
