Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 2023-07-09 18:01, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>> The file should have not been used to create the
>> links. The links should have been created based
>> on the reviion of libvirtd
>
> Why not? That's exactly what ldconfig does. It creates links to the latest
> version of the library. There's an ldconfig systemd unit that runs at boot
> to fix things up if necessary.
I don't _think_ the ldconfig.service unit should touch any
symlinks. It calls `/sbin/ldconfig -X` where -X means:
Don't update links. Unless -N is also specified, the
cache is still rebuilt.
But I haven't looked at the source or tested to see what it
does if a symlink is missing entirely. I don't know if that
is considered "updating" it or not.
I do think this problem is a self-made one. Anyone who's
manually adding, changing, or removing symlinks in /usr/lib*
is on their own to fix what they may have broken.
--
Todd
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
