On Fri, 03 Jul 2020 12:02:40 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 7/3/20 11:59 AM, Beartooth wrote: >> IF (big if) I understand aright, the answer is that there are >> various colors in command output, such as ls making folders differ from >> files; all are fine except one. >> >> That one is the color dnf upgrade uses to list what it proposes to >> change. (What it reports while making the changes is fine.) At present >> it shows bright chartreuse on pale blue -- which just fuzzes out. > > If the only problem is the one color from dnf, then either disable dnf > colors or use the information from the last thread to adjust the color > that's causing the problem. I found /etc/dnf/DIR_COLORS, /etc/dnf/DIR_COLORS.256color, and /etc/dnf/DIR_COLORS.lightbgcolor. In the first one, I found among much else "# If you use DOS-style suffixes, you may want to uncomment the following: #.cmd 01;32 # executables (bright green)" I changed 32 to 31; removed both hashmarks; no joy; rebooted; still no joy. Am I editing the wrong file? That comment about suffixes doesn't quite sit right, but I didn't see anything else that looked likelier. -- Beartooth Staffwright, Not Quite Clueless Power User Remember I know little (precious little!) of where up is. _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
