Re: upgrade problem: space on '/' filesystem.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(responding to Ed)
> Yes, research is required.  Especially in the event one may be using some of them.
> I would not willy-nilly erase all of them.

Last Thursday, I came "that close" to running that
"dnf remove $(dnf repoquery --extras --exclude=kernel,kernel-\*)".
Looks like it's a good thing that I didn't.  It looks like I understood the instructions too simply.

(responding to Samuel)
> This is a 3rd-party application that you installed manually.
sigh.  How did I miss that?  (don't answer!)  You're correct.  It's for zoom meetings.  On a few issues that I bring to this list, I wish I could do a zoom meeting to deal with it.  With one of this list's authoritative experts on the other end, it would be faster, easier, and more effective.  Both microsoft and HP have tools for connecting to a remote windows workstation; such a tool could also work.  Does Fedora have such a tool?

> Since they're not causing you any problems and removing them won't get you much space back,
> is it worth the effort to weed them out?
Mostly agree.  Let's put this aside for now, deal one two other upgrade questions/issues, and then handle the too-nearly-full filesystem in a separate thread.  But I think ultimately, the junk ought to be properly identified and cleaned out.

The first upgrade question/issue:

During the download phase, dnf displayed the following:
-----
Running transaction test The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
-----
and when re-doing the download, dnf displayed the following:
-----
Download complete! Use 'dnf system-upgrade reboot' to start the upgrade.
To remove cached metadata and transaction use 'dnf system-upgrade clean'
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
-----
My sense is that those two dnf commands are things the sys.admin. does if something goes wrong and he has to back-track (or start over).  Am I correct, or should I do those?  By the way, the dnf man page makes no mention of a system-upgrade command.

Let's deal with this one first, then I'll post the second.

thanks,
Bill.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux