Re: is grubby a dumb software?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2019-05-26 at 08:20 -0700, stan via users wrote:
> On Sun, 26 May 2019 10:49:00 +0200
> François Patte <francois.patte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Bonjour,
> > 
> > For a long time now grubby has replaced grub2-mkconfig to update the
> > grub.cfg file. From this time, I have to correct the kernel update
> > manualy with grub2-mkconfig because every time grubby chooses a wrong
> > partition as the / partition.
> > 
> > The choosen partition is not mounted, it is empty, with no boot
> > flag....
> > 
> > Why grubby chooses this partition? It is so stupide that I am
> > wondering what is the way followed by grubby to to this?
> 
> As far as I know, grubby used to merely copy the previous first entry in
> the grub.cfg file and replace the old kernel with the new kernel.
> So, that would imply that there is something wrong with the grub.cfg
> file. Of course, grubby could have a bug, but as you say it has worked
> fine for a long time. 
> 
> And, there is the new setup in F30, where it seems instead of a config
> file there are scriptlets that emulate a config file.  I have no first
> hand experience with that, but I've seen people having trouble with it
> on this list. You might be running into that.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:


My understanding is that grubby has been replaced for a standard install
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.orghttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BootLoaderSpecByDefault

Things that may be relevant:
1. Fresh install not an upgrade
2. No separate /boot partition
3. EFI boot of install media - hence EFI installation
4. No logical volumes anywhere on the SSD
5. BLS installation by default !?

I carried out a clean install of F30, it may well be different for an upgrade.

In my case the F30 boot using BLS was successful.

However, other F28/F29 installations on the same SSD were not detected.
This was because grub2-mkconfig uses os-prober which has problems.

As I am not interested in booting other OS than Fedora the
addition of the other Fedora to the boot menu is manageable.

Approach 1 - Older Approach
Generate a /etc/grub.d/40_custom file of the form
[root@naxos:/boot/efi/EFI/fedora]$ cat /etc/grub.d/40_custom
#!/usr/bin/sh
exec tail -n +3 $0
# This file provides an easy way to add custom menu entries.  Simply type the
# menu entries you want to add after this comment.  Be careful not to change
# the 'exec tail' line above.
    menuentry 'ja 29 custom ' {
        insmod part_gpt
        insmod ext2
        search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root 1a9ccef1-af1c-4c26-8e4d-64a25bc56fcc
        linux /boot/vmlinuz-5.0.16-200.fc29.x86_64 root=UUID=1a9ccef1-af1c-4c26-8e4d-64a25bc56fcc
        initrd /boot/initramfs-5.0.16-200.fc29.x86_64.img
    }

Run grub2-mkconfig -o test and check things are looking good
replace /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg with this file if you are feeling confident!
//---------------------------------------------------
Approach 2 - Try Using BLS approach
This should be safer than option 1 as no existing files are touched

Create a BLS file of the form
[root@naxos:/boot/efi/EFI/fedora]$ cat /boot/loader/entries/ja_77d7a92bb0374635a7212709d7339559-5.0.17-
300.fc30.x86_64.conf
title Fedora 5.0.17-300.fc30.x86_64
version 5.0.17-300.fc30.x86_64
linux /boot/fc30/vmlinuz-5.0.17-300.fc30.x86_64
initrd /boot/fc30/initramfs-5.0.17-300.fc30.x86_64.img
options root=UUID=32524647-c8e8-49cb-9c6f-ae25b663fa54
grub_users $grub_users
grub_arg --unrestricted
grub_class kernel
architecture    x64
[root@naxos:/boot/efi/EFI/fedora]$


Copy the correct kernel&initramfs files to the location shown in the file above
//---------------------------------------------------
The two options are not mutually exclusive - at least, not on my system!

I attach a very crude script that carries out Option 2 above

There is absolutely no warranty with this script!!
It may give some food for thought.

Again on my new F30 install, I do not think that grub2-mkconfig is not run when a kernel
upgrade is installed.
Only a new config file is installed in the /boot/loader/entries directory.
(and the new kernel/initramfs [stored in /boot not a subdirectory]).

I have successfully run the script on "other partition" to root (/)
with a version of Fedora F27 or F29 installed on the particular partitions.

I have also run it on the booted root (/) partition.

mount |grep " / "[root@naxos:/etc/grub.d]$ mount |grep " / "
/dev/nvme0n1p8 on / type ext4 (rw,relatime,seclabel)

[root@naxos:/etc/grub.d]$ /home/ja/bin/part_scan.sh /dev/nvme0n1p8
32524647-c8e8-49cb-9c6f-ae25b663fa54
Machine ID = 77d7a92bb0374635a7212709d7339559
vmlinuz-5.0.17-300.fc30.x86_64
initramfs-5.0.17-300.fc30.x86_64.img
5.0.17-300
5.0.17-300.fc30.x86_64
fc30
/boot/loader/entries/ja_77d7a92bb0374635a7212709d7339559-5.0.17-300.fc30.x86_64.conf
[root@naxos:/etc/grub.d]$

[root@naxos:/etc/grub.d]$ ltr /boot/fc30
total 31140
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root  8863944 May 26 17:54 vmlinuz-5.0.17-300.fc30.x86_64
-rw-------. 1 root root 23017597 May 26 17:54 initramfs-5.0.17-300.fc30.x86_64.img
[root@naxos:/etc/grub.d]$ 

[root@naxos:/etc/grub.d]$ cat /boot/loader/entries/ja_77d7a92bb0374635a7212709d7339559-5.0.17-
300.fc30.x86_64.conf 
title naxos.jaa.org.uk /dev/nvme0n1p8 5.0.17-300.fc30.x86_64
version 5.0.17-300.fc30.x86_64
linux /boot/fc30/vmlinuz-5.0.17-300.fc30.x86_64
initrd /boot/fc30/initramfs-5.0.17-300.fc30.x86_64.img
options root=UUID=32524647-c8e8-49cb-9c6f-ae25b663fa54
grub_users $grub_users
grub_arg --unrestricted
grub_class kernel
architecture    x64
[root@naxos:/etc/grub.d]$ 

Attachment: part_scan.sh
Description: application/shellscript

_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux