Le 26/05/2019 à 19:04, ja a écrit : > On Sun, 2019-05-26 at 08:20 -0700, stan via users wrote: >> On Sun, 26 May 2019 10:49:00 +0200 >> François Patte <francois.patte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Bonjour, >>> >>> For a long time now grubby has replaced grub2-mkconfig to update the >>> grub.cfg file. From this time, I have to correct the kernel update >>> manualy with grub2-mkconfig because every time grubby chooses a wrong >>> partition as the / partition. >>> >>> The choosen partition is not mounted, it is empty, with no boot >>> flag.... >>> >>> Why grubby chooses this partition? It is so stupide that I am >>> wondering what is the way followed by grubby to to this? >> >> As far as I know, grubby used to merely copy the previous first entry in >> the grub.cfg file and replace the old kernel with the new kernel. >> So, that would imply that there is something wrong with the grub.cfg >> file. Of course, grubby could have a bug, but as you say it has worked >> fine for a long time. >> >> And, there is the new setup in F30, where it seems instead of a config >> file there are scriptlets that emulate a config file. I have no first >> hand experience with that, but I've seen people having trouble with it >> on this list. You might be running into that. >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: > > > My understanding is that grubby has been replaced for a standard install I don't understant what you mean here... > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.orghttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BootLoaderSpecByDefault The browser answer is: Not found > > Things that may be relevant: > 1. Fresh install not an upgrade I update my f29 system > 2. No separate /boot partition I have a separate boot partition > 3. EFI boot of install media - hence EFI installation My install is not an EFI one > 4. No logical volumes anywhere on the SSD I use lvm > 5. BLS installation by default !? ??? Moreover my system uses raid-1 + lvm Do you mean that grubby --- which seems to be the grub configuration tool chosen by fedora --- cannot handle my installation? What can I do: change to another distrib? another answer to my post says: > As far as I know, grubby used to merely copy the previous first entry in > the grub.cfg file I can say: no! If this was the case there will not be any problem... My GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX in /etc/default/grub point to the right partition but it seems that grubby does not care... -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
