On 5/10/19 8:28 AM, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 10May2019 07:13, Ed Greshko <ed.greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 5/10/19 2:01 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: >>> On 5/9/19 4:23 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: >>>> If I were trying to get this working I would make sure the Interface of the ASUS was >>>> something like 192.168.1.5 and I would run the ASUS in Bridge mode. >>>> >>>> This way everything on your network could have IP addresses of 192.168.1.X >>>> >>>> There should be no reason to use NAT in the ASUS. >>> >>> Except that from his original email, he wants all traffic to go through the ASUS so that >>> he can do traffic control. He is getting too much traffic over the internet link now >>> that he doesn't have that. >> >> Oh, right. Forgot all about that. >> >> Double-NAT seems like it could be a solution. But I've run into issues with that. It was >> years ago so I can't recall the details. > > Double NAT has seemed to work ok for us. It would be interesting to hear of counter > examples. I'm talking only about outbound connections here, BTW. > Right, outbound was fine. I'm pretty sure it was issues where port-forwarding or UPnP services were involved. -- Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default color scheme _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
