On 10May2019 07:13, Ed Greshko <ed.greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 5/10/19 2:01 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/9/19 4:23 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
If I were trying to get this working I would make sure the Interface of the ASUS was
something like 192.168.1.5 and I would run the ASUS in Bridge mode.
This way everything on your network could have IP addresses of 192.168.1.X
There should be no reason to use NAT in the ASUS.
Except that from his original email, he wants all traffic to go through the ASUS so that
he can do traffic control. He is getting too much traffic over the internet link now
that he doesn't have that.
Oh, right. Forgot all about that.
Double-NAT seems like it could be a solution. But I've run into issues with that. It was
years ago so I can't recall the details.
Double NAT has seemed to work ok for us. It would be interesting to hear
of counter examples. I'm talking only about outbound connections here,
BTW.
Cheers,
Cameron Simpson <cs@xxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
