On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 12:01 +0000, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 10:55 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 2/2/19 6:13 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Fri, 2019-02-01 at 17:55 +0000, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > They both show *the same MAC address*: 52:54:00:8b:88:60, which looks > > > > at least suspicious. > > > Correction: the address being shown (while arp is still working) is > > > that of the gateway, so naturally it's the same in both guests. > > > > > OK, I misunderstood what you were saying. > > > > Yes, arp should return the MAC addresses of the gateway. And, incomplete does confirm > > that communication has been lost between the guest and the gateway. > > > > Ahh.....can't think of what to try next. > > Yes, I'm at a loss. Note that in all cases the IPv6 connection keeps > working. I'll either BZ it or look for a libvirt list to ask on. > > Thanks again Ed. > > poc > Last ditch left-field idea: I have a (commercial) VPN service which is not normally turned on but does have a systemd daemon running. I turned it off and everything started working. I am now looking at 3 Fedora guests and a Windows guest all connected and even able to ping each other. I think the VPN daemon was messing with the firewall. I'll have to see what to do about that but for now, it looks like this was the culprit all along. Who knew? Apologies for wasting everyone's time, but maybe there's a lesson here somewhere ... poc _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
