On 1/28/19 6:06 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 08:20 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >>>> [egreshko@meimei .ssh]$ sudo firewall-cmd --info-zone=public >>>> public (active) >>>> target: default >>>> icmp-block-inversion: no >>>> interfaces: enp2s0 vnet0 wlp4s0 >>>> sources: >>>> services: dhcpv6-client dns kde-connect mdns ssh >>>> ports: >>>> protocols: >>>> masquerade: no >>>> forward-ports: >>>> source-ports: >>>> icmp-blocks: >>>> rich rules: >>> Nothing to remark on there I think. I have some extra ports and >>> services enabled but that's to be expected. >>> >> I was noting the difference between yours... >> >> interfaces: enp3s0 p3p1 virbr0 virbr0-nic >> >> and mine >> >> interfaces: enp2s0 vnet0 wlp4s0 > Surely you must have virbr0? Not sure where virbr0-nic comes from but I > assume it's created by libvirt. > Sure, 4: virbr0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 52:54:00:9a:e8:49 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.122.1/24 brd 192.168.122.255 scope global virbr0 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever but, it doesn't show up in results of the firewall-cmd [root@meimei ~]# firewall-cmd --get-active-zones public interfaces: enp2s0 wlp4s0 vnet0 It does show in the firewall-applet as a connection "virbr0 (Default Zone: public)" Actually, vnet0, wasn't even there initially until I manually added it to "public". Originally the line read interfaces: enp2s0 wlp4s0 I've reverted to this condition. Have you tried with the FW stopped? -- Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default color scheme _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
