On 1/27/19 10:45 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Thanks for your patience in looking at this Ed. Don't feel pressured to > keep responding I only feel pressure to respond to our cats. Oh, and my wife. Besides, who doesn't love a mystery? When I was talking about the MAC addresses I was speculating that the guests may have the conflict. Not that an interface on the host may. If you use wireshark to monitor just vnet0 and do an ssh to the guest do you see an ARP request/response happen first? Is it correct? I'm being distracted by other things at the moment, but just noticed that my FW shows a difference. [egreshko@meimei .ssh]$ sudo firewall-cmd --info-zone=public public (active) target: default icmp-block-inversion: no interfaces: enp2s0 vnet0 wlp4s0 sources: services: dhcpv6-client dns kde-connect mdns ssh ports: protocols: masquerade: no forward-ports: source-ports: icmp-blocks: rich rules: -- Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default color scheme _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
