On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 05:42, ToddAndMargo via users <users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 10/29/18 6:30 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 04:26:46PM -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > >> The big question is how will IBM look at it. RHEL is pretty much > >> unusable for newer software as RHEL is so bug riddled and out of > >> date. > > > Don't know why you think RHEL is bug riddled. it's stable and > > will run for years. > > Glad you asked. I make that statement from my experience with RHEL > and Clones. > > What RHEL does is to make some minor tweaks and freeze a defunct > version of Fedora. It is by design, meaning purposefully, an > anti-Kaisen operating system for the reasons you described. > If you only run what is in the box, it will run and run > as your described. > This is not what RHEL is, or how it is made. The rest of your post illustrates that you don't actually know what RHEL is for. If you need to support validated systems then you do not want an OS that changes every six months and wont run unless every component in it is upgraded. They both have a place. -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
