Re: dnf upgrade issues (F28)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Samuel Sieb <samuel@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 08/06/2018 09:52 AM, Jarmo Hurri wrote:
>> warning: /var/cache/dnf/rpmfusion-free-da4c8a3a7c39e479/packages/compat-ffmpeg28-2.8.14-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm: Header V4 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 09eab3f2: NOKEY
>> Public key for compat-ffmpeg28-2.8.14-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm is not installed
>> The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction.
>> You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
>> Error: GPG check FAILED
>
> Note that this is not Fedora, this is rpmfusion.  

Fair enough.

There are two errors, one a conflict for gstreamer1 plugins, the other
that message for compat-ffmpeg28. I uninstalled the problematic
gstreamer1 plugins, so I am fine with that now.

But the second issue, the one you are referring to below, is more
problematic.

> Now there appear to be two problems.  The first problem is that it
> seems that you don't have the rpmfusion keys registered.  

How would this show up in general? I do have a bunch of packages
installed successfully from rpmfusion, for example

*******************************************************************************
[jarmo@localhost ~]$ dnf list installed normalize
Installed Packages
normalize.x86_64                         0.7.7-15.fc28                          @rpmfusion-free
*******************************************************************************

> The other problem is that you are getting an old version of
> compat-ffmpeg28.  The version I have installed is
> compat-ffmpeg28-2.8.15-1.

Ok, this is interesting and the real culprit. Because this problem comes
from upgrading firefox, which I think is from redhat updates, not
rpmfusion:

*******************************************************************************
[root@localhost ~]$ dnf upgrade firefox
Last metadata expiration check: 0:06:44 ago on Thu 09 Aug 2018 15:46:26 EEST.
Dependencies resolved.
================================================================================
 Package              Arch        Version             Repository           Size
================================================================================
Upgrading:
 firefox              x86_64      61.0.1-3.fc28       updates              88 M
Installing dependencies:
 libdc1394            x86_64      2.2.2-10.fc28       fedora              125 k
 openjpeg-libs        x86_64      1.5.1-21.fc28       fedora               90 k
 schroedinger         x86_64      1.0.11-16.fc28      fedora              330 k
Installing weak dependencies:
 compat-ffmpeg28      x86_64      2.8.14-1.fc28       rpmfusion-free      5.6 M

Transaction Summary
================================================================================
Install  4 Packages
Upgrade  1 Package

Total size: 94 M
Is this ok [y/N]: Downloading Packages:
[SKIPPED] compat-ffmpeg28-2.8.14-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded         
[SKIPPED] libdc1394-2.2.2-10.fc28.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded               
[SKIPPED] openjpeg-libs-1.5.1-21.fc28.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded           
[SKIPPED] schroedinger-1.0.11-16.fc28.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded           
[SKIPPED] firefox-61.0.1-3.fc28.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded                 
warning: /var/cache/dnf/rpmfusion-free-da4c8a3a7c39e479/packages/compat-ffmpeg28-2.8.14-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm: Header V4 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 09eab3f2: NOKEY
Public key for compat-ffmpeg28-2.8.14-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm is not installed
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
Error: GPG check FAILED
*******************************************************************************

So compat-ffmpeg28 is pulled from rpmfusion-free as a "weak dependency."
I can actually now circumvent this problem by running

dnf upgrade --disablerepo=rpmfusion-free

but I don't want to do it before I understand what is going on.

So my questions are:

1. From which repo does your compat-ffmpeg28-2.8.15-1 come from? I get

   [jarmo@localhost ~]$ dnf list available compat-ffmpeg28
   Last metadata expiration check: 0:08:29 ago on Thu 09 Aug 2018 15:51:37 EEST.
   Available Packages
   compat-ffmpeg28.i686                         2.8.14-1.fc28                       rpmfusion-free
   compat-ffmpeg28.x86_64                       2.8.14-1.fc28                       rpmfusion-free


2. Why does running "dnf upgrade firefox" pull this other stuff? Should it?

Thanks in advance.

Jarmo
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/OU7M7T44IHWSFEMALWEWKRKQLVX7XKSC/



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux