On Sat, 2018-06-02 at 09:17 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 06/02/2018 08:44 AM, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > See: 2001 or so unless you had upgraded to a new gblic there wasn't a > > need to reboot Linux machines. Most of the times it was enough to log > > in/out of your X. And that was it. And that approach was, AFAICS, what > > John Morris probably was referring to. > > From the other threads on this topic, this was not entirely true. And > now, there are many more moving parts so the chance of running into a > problem are higher. If you update libraries, you have restart all the > services that use them. That's what tracer is for. My earlier comment was to ask if you were aware of some problem with tracer, but you've since clarified that you don't use it, so the question is moot. > And your point about logging out of X defeats > most of the purpose of doing a live update anyway. Most people want to > do it to avoid closing their open applications. And updating something > like LibreOffice or Firefox while it's running is just asking for trouble. Most apps don't care, but tracer will tell you anyway and let you decide. Also, I usually have a VM running (Windows 10) that I prefer not to have to restart just because I updated one of Linux's libraries that the VM doesn't depend on. This might even mean restarting my desktop session, which I can do without the VM even noticing. Forcing updates to be done offline is using a sledgehammer to break a nut. poc _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/GTXYUOF57B5JVMNWLTIYUQFINFNGEJ7R/
