Re: Fedora upgrade, 25 to 26 -

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/15/2017 05:55 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 07/15/17 04:51, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>> On 07/14/17 18:22, Rick Stevens wrote:
>>> If you have both the i686 and x86_64 versions of gedit installed, try
>>> uninstalling the out-of-arch version (e.g. uninstall the i686 version
>>> if you're on a 64-bit machine).
>>>
>>> I lost the top of this thread. Did you do
>>>
>>>     $ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --allowerasing --refresh
>>> --releasever=26
>>>
>>> to start the upgrade? Note the reboot doesn't do any downloads--it
>>> just installs the RPMs already downloaded via the "dnf system-upgrade
>>> download" command.
>>> ------------------------------
>> +
>>
>> We have been having near continuous t-storms all night it seems and
>> rain kills my path to the satellite but it appears to have let up so I
>> am trying the command line [again] as suggested.
>>
>> I first dnf removed gedit which took out the i686 files and did:
>>
>> dnf system-upgrade download --allowerasing --refresh --releasever=26
>>
>> as suggested. It skipped all the previously downloaded files, added
>> several more and completed that part in a minute or so. The upgrade
>> was rebooted and it is presently installing 3821 files.
>>
>> Hopefully this will succeed, I will report the result later this morning.
>>
>> Thanks for the help,
>>
>> Bob
> +
> 
> Yes, that appears to have worked as expected, removing gedit to
> eliminate the conflict there was the key. Once updated I let dnf install
> the proper version of gedit. All I've tried so far has worked so it
> looks good to go. I did change the desktop background to plain #0000ff
> blue. That was my secondary computer, I'll try this one when I feel more
> courageous ...
> 
> Thanks to all,
> 
> Bob

Glad you got it sorted. Sometimes weirdness like that occurs--especially
if you have a dual-lib system (lots of Wine users have issues like
this). I've often thought that it'd be really nice if there was a "hint"
you could give dnf that says "in the case of conflicts in architectures,
x86_64 wins", but I think the code to implement that sort of thing would
be fairly complex since there are so many possible conflicts.

Humans are still the best pattern-recognition engines on the planet and
I guess letting us decide what needs to be done is best.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital    ricks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -
- AIM/Skype: therps2        ICQ: 226437340           Yahoo: origrps2 -
-                                                                    -
-           If it's stupid and it works...it ain't stupid!           -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux