On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Ed Greshko <ed.greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/21/17 19:54, Tom H wrote: >> Maybe it would've been clearer if the outputs of lvm and mdadm had >> been included, but it's clear that: >> >> - there are two mdadm raid1s of 1G and 34G, >> >> - /boot is the 1G raidvol, >> >> - /, /var, /home, and swap are LVs on the 34G raidvol. > > OK, fair enough. :) > You saw some of the output from lvm commands in another message. Yes, thanks. > [root@2disk proc]# mdadm -Q /dev/sda1 > /dev/sda1: is not an md array > /dev/sda1: device 0 in 2 device active raid1 /dev/md/boot. Use mdadm > --examine for more detail. > [root@2disk proc]# mdadm -Q /dev/sda2 > /dev/sda2: is not an md array > /dev/sda2: device 0 in 2 device active raid1 /dev/md/pv00. Use mdadm > --examine for more detail. > [root@2disk proc]# mdadm -Q /dev/sdb1 > /dev/sdb1: is not an md array > /dev/sdb1: device 1 in 2 device active raid1 /dev/md/boot. Use mdadm > --examine for more detail. > [root@2disk proc]# mdadm -Q /dev/sdb2 > /dev/sdb2: is not an md array > /dev/sdb2: device 1 in 2 device active raid1 /dev/md/pv00. Use mdadm > --examine for more detail. > > [root@2disk md]# mdadm -Q /dev/md/boot > /dev/md/boot: 953.44MiB raid1 2 devices, 0 spares. Use mdadm --detail > for more detail. > [root@2disk md]# mdadm -Q /dev/md/pv00 > /dev/md/pv00: 31.05GiB raid1 2 devices, 0 spares. Use mdadm --detail for > more detail. Thanks. I've been using mdadm for a long time and didn't know about "-Q". I use "-D md_device" and "-E md_component"; and sometimes mix them up :) _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
