On 01/09/2016 08:16 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 19:18 +0100, Philip Brown wrote:
On 01/09/2016 06:21 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 10:41 -0500, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Ed Greshko <ed.greshko@xxxxxxxxxx
m>
wrote:
mpg123 is available from the rpmfusion repos.
Thanks Ed!
Is there any side-effect from enabling the rpmfusion repos?
Conflict with system libs?
No, stuff in RPMfusion is there because of license issues, but I've
never had a problem with it. I suspect most people on the list have
it
enabled.
poc
if you don't want to install all the extra software repos etc... you
can
just grab the rpms from rpmfusion, unzip and get all the .so files
out
of them and place them in your .local/share/gstreamer-1.0/plugins
folder. a la:
ls .local/share/gstreamer-1.0/plugins/
libgsta52dec.so libgstcdio.so libgstlame.so
libgstrmdemux.so
libgstamrnb.so libgstdvdlpcmdec.so libgstlibav.so
libgsttwolame.so
libgstamrwbdec.so libgstdvdread.so libgstmad.so libgstx264.so
libgstasf.so libgstdvdsub.so libgstmpeg2dec.so
libgstxingmux.so
and most all codecs will now run in your gnome applications without
any worries.
That means you get to check back periodically and repeat the process by
hand if they've been updated. I don't see why most people would do
that. There really isn't a problem enabling RPMfusion repos. They are
designed to be used with the standard Fedora repos so you aren't going
to magically install stuff that conflicts.
poc
yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
--
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
