On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 19:18 +0100, Philip Brown wrote: > On 01/09/2016 06:21 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 10:41 -0500, Fernando Cassia wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Ed Greshko <ed.greshko@xxxxxxxxxx > > > m> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > mpg123 is available from the rpmfusion repos. > > > > > > Thanks Ed! > > > > > > Is there any side-effect from enabling the rpmfusion repos? > > > Conflict with system libs? > > No, stuff in RPMfusion is there because of license issues, but I've > > never had a problem with it. I suspect most people on the list have > > it > > enabled. > > > > poc > > if you don't want to install all the extra software repos etc... you > can > just grab the rpms from rpmfusion, unzip and get all the .so files > out > of them and place them in your .local/share/gstreamer-1.0/plugins > folder. a la: > > ls .local/share/gstreamer-1.0/plugins/ > libgsta52dec.so libgstcdio.so libgstlame.so > libgstrmdemux.so > libgstamrnb.so libgstdvdlpcmdec.so libgstlibav.so > libgsttwolame.so > libgstamrwbdec.so libgstdvdread.so libgstmad.so libgstx264.so > libgstasf.so libgstdvdsub.so libgstmpeg2dec.so > libgstxingmux.so > > and most all codecs will now run in your gnome applications without > any worries. That means you get to check back periodically and repeat the process by hand if they've been updated. I don't see why most people would do that. There really isn't a problem enabling RPMfusion repos. They are designed to be used with the standard Fedora repos so you aren't going to magically install stuff that conflicts. poc -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
