Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:43:50 -0500 On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 19:35 +-0800, Ed Greshko wrote: +AD4 On 07/12/15 19:23, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: +AD4 +AD4 Thank you for your reply. I had to remove f22 dcmtk before this +AD4 +AD4 would +AD4 +AD4 work, but at least I have my DICOM viewer back. Thanks again+ACEAIQAhACEAIQ +AD4 +AD4 You're welcome. +AD4 +AD4 You may want to add an +ACI-exclude+ACI in your dnf.conf for the F21 +AD4 packages so they get skipped the next time you do an update to your +AD4 system. +AD4 +AD4 -- +AD4 Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora +AD4 - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Everyone, I have been in dialog with the Fedora maintainer of aeskulap, Ankur Sinha, and he is working to get it ready for F22. He has filled a bug report for dcmtk. Ankur's response to one of my e-mails is as follows: +AD4 +AD4 No worries. I looked at the error, but it probably requires me to look +AD4 into dcmtk changes to fix it. I've filed a bug here for the time +AD4 being: +AD4 +AD4 https://github.com/pipelka/aeskulap/issues/2 +AD4 +AD4 This seems to be the original author of aeskulap, so I'm hopeful that +AD4 we'll have a fix. Greg
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
