Re: aeskulap and dicom files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22.  I had it on F21 and
> > before.  It was a very decent dicom viewer. 
> > 
> > Does anyone know why this was not included in F22.  It was a good
> > product.
> 
> Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't 
> appear to be a very active or maintained application.  The last 
> release was in 2007.  It is possible that with changes to system 
> libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain?
> 
> If you need it, why don't you try downloading the F21 rpm and 
> installing it on your F22 system.
> 
> -- 
> Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora 
> - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4

Ed,

Thanks for your response.  That was a good idea, but I did not get very
far :

[root@HmGe f21]# rpm -Uhvf aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
libdcmimage.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
libdcmimgle.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
libdcmjpeg.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
libdcmnet.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
libijg12.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
libijg16.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
libijg8.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
liboflog.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
libofstd.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64

I have tried to contact the maintainer of f21 aeskulap, 
sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx, to see if I could persuade him to maintain the
package for f22, but I he has not responded yet.

This was really an excellent product even though the developer has not
added to it since 2007.

If anyone else has ideas I would appreciate suggestions.

Greg


-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux