On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 11:00 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > > Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22. I had it on F21 and > > > before. It was a very decent dicom viewer. > > > > > > Does anyone know why this was not included in F22. It was a good > > > product. > > > > Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't > > appear to be a very active or maintained application. The last > > release was in 2007. It is possible that with changes to system > > libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain? > > > > If you need it, why don't you try downloading the F21 rpm and > > installing it on your F22 system. > > > > -- > > Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora > > - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 > > Ed, > > Thanks for your response. That was a good idea, but I did not get very > far : > > [root@HmGe f21]# rpm -Uhvf aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm > error: Failed dependencies: > libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 > -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 > libdcmimage.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 > -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 > libdcmimgle.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 > -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 > libdcmjpeg.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 > -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 > libdcmnet.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 > -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 > libijg12.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 > -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 > libijg16.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 > -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 > libijg8.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 > -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 > liboflog.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 > -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 > libofstd.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 > -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 > > I have tried to contact the maintainer of f21 aeskulap, > sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx, to see if I could persuade him to maintain the > package for f22, but I he has not responded yet. > > This was really an excellent product even though the developer has not > added to it since 2007. > > If anyone else has ideas I would appreciate suggestions. > > Greg > Hi This worked OK for me I don't even think I needed to download aeskulap separately 2015_07_10 Down loaded aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm from F21 mirror Installed on F22 as follows dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm Hope it helps John ======================================================================================================== ======================================================================================================== ========================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ======================================================================================================== ======================================================================================================== ========================= Installing: CharLS x86_64 1.0-8.fc21 fedora 66 k aeskulap x86_64 0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21 @commandline 1.1 M dcmtk x86_64 3.6.0-18.fc21 fedora 3.9 M gconfmm26 x86_64 2.28.3-8.fc21 fedora 46 k libglademm24 x86_64 2.6.7-11.fc21 fedora 42 k Transaction Summary ======================================================================================================== ======================================================================================================== ========================= Install 5 Packages -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
