On 03.02.2015 18:15, poma wrote: > On 03.02.2015 11:07, Thomas Woerner wrote: >> On 02/02/2015 05:55 PM, poma wrote: >>> On 02.02.2015 17:49, poma wrote: >>>> On 02.02.2015 17:36, Tim Waugh wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 17:32 +0100, poma wrote: >>>>>> can this mechanism be improved in the way when you chose not to want >>>>>> to share the printer that the relevant port is closed? >>>>> >>>>> Is there a sane way of doing that though? I think applications wanting >>>>> to 'reset' ports for a zone would need to know what the default was to >>>>> start with. >>>>> >>>>> Tim. >>>>> */ >>>>> >>>> >>>> I really do not understand what should be an obstacle. :) >>>> Just to close the port that is no longer used, the same way that we opened. >>>> >>> >>> Mister Woerner, Popelka care to comment? >>> Perhaps I missed some technicalities related. >>> >>> >> I think it would make sense to be able to see if ipp* was enabled in the >> initial configuration of a zone. Right now this is not possible. >> >> We might be able to add interfaces to get initial zone, service etc. >> configuration settings. >> >> Regards, >> Thomas >> > > I think I understand, but I also think that I did not understand. > Cogito ergo sum. > > https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/firewalld.git/tree/TODO#n24 Future Features: - reflect config changes in firewalld status? CONFIG_CHANGED/RELOAD_NEEDED? If you refer to this possible future feature you represent as a requirement for external applications to participate in the configuration? -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
