On 02.02.2015 17:49, poma wrote: > On 02.02.2015 17:36, Tim Waugh wrote: >> On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 17:32 +0100, poma wrote: >>> can this mechanism be improved in the way when you chose not to want >>> to share the printer that the relevant port is closed? >> >> Is there a sane way of doing that though? I think applications wanting >> to 'reset' ports for a zone would need to know what the default was to >> start with. >> >> Tim. >> */ >> > > I really do not understand what should be an obstacle. :) > Just to close the port that is no longer used, the same way that we opened. > Mister Woerner, Popelka care to comment? Perhaps I missed some technicalities related. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
