poma ha scrito il 02/02/2015 alle 17:55:
On 02.02.2015 17:49, poma wrote:
On 02.02.2015 17:36, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 17:32 +0100, poma wrote:
can this mechanism be improved in the way when you chose not to want
to share the printer that the relevant port is closed?
Is there a sane way of doing that though? I think applications wanting
to 'reset' ports for a zone would need to know what the default was to
start with.
Tim.
*/
I really do not understand what should be an obstacle. :)
Just to close the port that is no longer used, the same way that we opened.
Mister Woerner, Popelka care to comment?
Perhaps I missed some technicalities related.
just from an humble user POV, shall I have to make any adjustment to my
firewaslld settings after installation of such an update???
--
Antonio M
Skype: amontag52
Linux Fedora F21 (Twenty one)
on Fujitsu Lifebook A512
http://lugsaronno.altervista.org
http://www.campingmonterosa.com
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
