On 03.02.2015 11:07, Thomas Woerner wrote: > On 02/02/2015 05:55 PM, poma wrote: >> On 02.02.2015 17:49, poma wrote: >>> On 02.02.2015 17:36, Tim Waugh wrote: >>>> On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 17:32 +0100, poma wrote: >>>>> can this mechanism be improved in the way when you chose not to want >>>>> to share the printer that the relevant port is closed? >>>> >>>> Is there a sane way of doing that though? I think applications wanting >>>> to 'reset' ports for a zone would need to know what the default was to >>>> start with. >>>> >>>> Tim. >>>> */ >>>> >>> >>> I really do not understand what should be an obstacle. :) >>> Just to close the port that is no longer used, the same way that we opened. >>> >> >> Mister Woerner, Popelka care to comment? >> Perhaps I missed some technicalities related. >> >> > I think it would make sense to be able to see if ipp* was enabled in the > initial configuration of a zone. Right now this is not possible. > > We might be able to add interfaces to get initial zone, service etc. > configuration settings. > > Regards, > Thomas > I think I understand, but I also think that I did not understand. Cogito ergo sum. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
