On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 16:33 -0500, Bob Goodwin wrote: > [bobg@box10 ~]$ cat > /home/bobg/.mozilla/firefox/iezecg4r.default/chrome/userContent.css > > * > { > color: white !important; > background: black !important; > border-color: red !important; > -moz-appearance: none !important;} > > This seems to do most of what I want. I see that photographic images > are still presented in color so many pages still contain everything > but are more easily read with the white text on a black background and > the red border shows that it's working. Good to know. A basic re-style is less likely to throw up nasty surprises, but you are still fighting against a webpage's own styling, which may have done all sorts of tricks to make their site work. The borders should only appear on things that were meant to have borders, so they should help reading things like tables, which would be difficult with no clue as to where the table cells were, for example. Images will be handled completely differently, and I'm not aware of any CSS that can be applied to images. So, if you did need to change image rendering, I think you'll need to find some kind of image processing plug-in. > However I've been tracking an airline flight [UAL 4215] on > Flightaware.com and most of the information on map presentation as > well as the graph of altitude and speed have lost most of their > detail. e.g. the map shows a line from KORF to KORD and nothing else. Yes, that kind of thing is the risk you run when altering a website. Being able to turn it on and off on the fly is probably needed. There is a good chance that some thing will become invisible. Especially on pages where the author set a foreground colour, but never bothered to set a background colour, or vice versa, where they depended on the default being what they expected. > -- tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 3.17.7-200.fc20.i686 #1 SMP Wed Dec 17 04:08:31 UTC 2014 i686 All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists. George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org