Sam Varshavchik writes:
David Benfell writes:Systemd needs to be a vast improvement to justify this. And it seems that not everyone even agrees that it's an improvement at all.Here's something that I can't figure out: with this entire thread in mind, why is all of this is being said /now/???What happened?I can understand reading stuff like this if systemd was new to Fedora 20. But it's not. It's been here for how many releases now? I forget (intentionally).I remember when, as soon as systemd arrived at the debutante ball, it was painfully obvious to me what a horrible abomination it was. I distinctly recall bitching about it immediately, but my voice was just one of a few.This flame war is, what, two years too late?
I haven't been on Fedora for two years, so I can't speak to that. But your voice was not alone. You should have seen the imbroglio on the Arch Users list.
If memory serves, the operators actually shut down that list for a day or two to allow tempers to cool down.
And I might add that at that time, I was inclined to view systemd somewhat more favorably than I do now.
-- David BenfellSee https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you do not understand the attachment.
Attachment:
pgp3gxt0zdJmn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
