Hi
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
Others are coming up with conjectures and presenting them as fact to
back up a particular position (the one that it's the responsibility of
projects to chase the latest and greatest infrastructure change).
There is no conjecture in what I said whatsoever. It is purely a fact. Remember that the original question was "Does it work with fvwm?" and "Hm, not really useful when it doesn`t work with existing WMs ...". I was merely pointing out that Wayland is just a protocol. Adding support for the protocol is done within the window managers and not the other way around.
> In their best interest if needed. But you didn't try to claim it's the
>*responsibility* of projects to change to Wayland.![]()
Those two things are not in conflict. If they do so, it would their responsibility to do the porting and maintain them. Noone suggested that we should force them.
> In their best interest if needed. But you didn't try to claim it's the
>*responsibility* of projects to change to Wayland.
Rahul
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
