On 3 April 2014 14:50, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I don't think we said anything contradictory at all. I pointed out > that the Wayland developers are including a compatibility layer called > XWayland that provides a backwards-compatible interface for > applications and window managers that are designed for X-Windows. > Rahul accurately pointed out that the nature of a compatibility > wrapper is such that it would never have the same real-world > performance as a pure implementation (such as x.org) and as such if > window managers (which tend to use far more of the low-level API than > applications do) want ideal performance, it is in their best interest > to port to the new Wayland code instead of relying on the X-Windows > compatibility. In their best interest if needed. But you didn't try to claim it's the *responsibility* of projects to change to Wayland. -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
