Ian Malone <ibmalone@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 23 March 2014 23:08, lee <lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Ian Malone <ibmalone@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> There is no-one on the planet who thinks emacs is minimalistic >> >> I`m not so sure about that. There are even ppl who have never heard >> about emacs, and if they`d see it, they might very well think it is. >> > > "Eight Megs and Constantly Swapping" This is a program which has the > reputation of having a module for everything. Why are people who have > never heard of it relevant? Because their existence disproves that nobody thinks that emacs is minimalistic. >> Even if they don`t, I can still edit them and make adjustments if >> necessary. If anything fails, I can print the sources as they are. Had >> I used some WYSIWYG word processing software instead, I wouldn`t even be >> able to read them anymore because this word processing software doesn`t >> exist anymore since a long time. >> > > Yes plain LaTeX is fairly readable in source form, but that's not an > absolute requirement for being future proof. Educate yourself on ODF. > You could even get the plain text out. ODF didn`t exist twenty years ago. -- Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug) -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
