Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Am 17.06.2013 04:29, schrieb lee: >> You're missing the point which was someones assumption that a particular >> component must be useless because it can be spf. I was merely asking if >> there's also the assumption that ppl go to all the considerable lengths >> required to avoid spfs (so that the components they are using aren't >> useless). >> >> Don't try to hold me responsible for other ppls logic, flawed or not > > it was *your* argumentation that *you* can not pull your disks > in a different machine because there is only one controller > on earth which can read your disks I haven't said that anywhere. > - this is usually *not* true for others because they have spare > controllers or not using hardware RAID and if *you* do not need > mcelog.service disable it and stop your uselles discussion why *you* > can not read logfiles if your system does not boot, others can Why don't you just stop claiming I said things I didn't say? Are you doing this so you have something to get upset about? > hence in professional environment you even use the --syslog > option and have logs on different machines where you can > read them even if the machine including disks and controller > is dead You can always do that if you have several computers at hand to direct log outputs to. What's your argument here? That I should get some more computers so that I can always read what mcelog might have to say? I'd have to disappoint you because I don't plan on running some kind of server farm just for that. -- "Object-oriented programming languages aren't completely convinced that you should be allowed to do anything with functions." http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2006/08/01.html -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
