Am 17.06.2013 03:44, schrieb lee: > Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> well, most people on Linux are using mdraid to avoid the useless >> question about "compatible hardware RAID controller" because it >> is pretty useless to have a RAID with a single-point-of-failure >> in form the controller > > How do these people answer questions like how to connect 10+ SATA and/or > SAS devices to their computers at the same time, how not to create a > bottleneck with software raid and how to eliminate every possible single > point of failure? why should these people do this with local disks? such things are done with SAN-storages with typically *two* conrollers for failover, if you rely on *one* single controller and nothing else can read your RAID you should hire someone with knowledge but what the hell has this to do with mcelog.service since nobody but you is using 10 SAS disks local attached hint: in such setups *you get* replacement controllers and disks by SLA's with the manufacturer within hours *you said* how can a different machine read my RAID well, normally this question should be answered *before* put any data on it > Are you assuming that most ppl using Linux have fallback systems with > independent internet connections and emergency power generators standing > by that automatically take over seamlessly when something with their > used system or around it fails? pff you do not need independent internet connections and power generators to plug software-raids to whatever computer because you can plug them with any SATA-to-USB and mdraid will recognize the array based on UUID's
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
