Am 01.04.2013 14:57, schrieb Reindl Harald: > > > Am 01.04.2013 14:47, schrieb Noah Cutler: >> I'm confused over the whole separate /usr partition is broken thing: >> http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken >> >> Everything appears to work swimmingly here after 1 month of use -- separate /usr partition does not appear to be >> broken...anymore?? > > maybe, maybe not, it is not well tested at all > It was never broken, when we started mounting /usr from within the initramfs after the /usr-move. >> Just trying to future proof my setup; if it's better to merge /usr into rootfs, so be it, better to do it early >> days with the new system. >> >> Otherwise, if someone can chime in here with some sage partitioning advice as to how to proceed moving forward with >> Fedora, that would be much appreciated. >> >> FWIW, as a beginner the benefits I see in a diverse micro-managed partitioning scheme (vs. the mega partition) is >> being able to fsck quickly; clone partitions quickly (e.g. copy to additional disks), and prevent runaway logs and >> the like (there are likely others) > > it makes ZERO sense to split /usr to a own partition > you owuld really clone a partition containing the whole system > or share it with another setup without the depending RPM database > which lives in /var/lib/rpm/? > > sorry but the idea of a seperate /usr is broken at all This is FUD. The idea is perfectly fine and we should bring our OS in shape for doing it so. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1ojgzJOfWB8XaC5kqyrv4IhR9snZKBI77a02R4cj1QM8/view -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
