Re: possible problem with scp/ssh/telnet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[inline]

On 8/12/2012 4:12 PM, David G. Miller wrote:
Paul Allen Newell <pnewell <at> cs.cmu.edu> writes:


<SNIP>

it is logging errors and I see the following:

Aug 11 23:43:43 yoyo kernel: [ 779.725071] <IPTABLES: LOG REJECT>
IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:1e:8c:c3:21:d6:08:00
SRC=192.168.2.14 DST=192.168.2.255 LEN=229 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=128
ID=33554 PROTO=UDP SPT=138 DPT=138 LEN=209
<SNIP>
Just a quick lesson in reading IP tables logs.  For first level connection
debugging I find the following pieces of information in the log to be most
useful:

SRC=IP address of the sending system
DST=IP address of the destination system

Do an ifconfig (Linux) or ipconfig (Windows) to see what the IP address is for
both end points.  Verifying these lets you make sure the problem isn't DNS.

Dave:

Thanks for reply.

I checked ifconfig/ipconfig, plus verified the hosts file on both machines. I also checked the tcp/ip settings on the Windows side. Everything looks correct and certainly has not changed.


PROTO=The protocol for the communication.  Typically one of UDP, TCP or ICMP.
ssh and telnet  use TCP so these log entries are for something else.

Missed that, thanks. I was just so happy to get a log on the two machines that I didn't check the PROTO. I did a quick rescan of the messages and there are no TCP entries as a PROTO. Yeah, I am confused


SPT=Source port.  Can be interesting if you have outbound firewall filter rules
(most people don't).
DPT=Destination port.  Identifies the service requested at the destination.
Look in /etc/services for definitions.  ssh is service (or port 22) and telnet
is service (or port) 23.  Your log entries are to port 138 so, again, nothing to
do with ssh or telnet.

Okay, more confusion as I am not seeing any port 22.

As mentioned in an earlier email today, everything is up and running so I can't do any more "tests when in failure mode".

My take on this is that I should treat the info in the logs to be not relevant, especially when I was able to prove Ed's thesis that the problem is on the cygwin/WinXP side given powering down the Fedora box and just running a self-referential ssh on the cygwin side generated the "connection refused" error.

I'm going to take the risk of not putting a question mark at the end of that sentence as I really hope that I have got this right

Paul

Cheers,
Dave


--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux