Am 07.07.2012 15:05, schrieb Fernando Cassia: > Thus, for starters, RedHat´s decision to pay for a signing key is the > practical approach, so users will be able to boot Fedora without > tweaking their BIOS/CMOS settings. > > But what I think could be challenged with antitrust regulators is > Microsoft CHARGING for it. To keep it a level playing field MSFT > should issue free keys to any OS development firm that asks for one, > whether commercial or open source. well, and this is what makes "secure boot" practically useless * using it: too many restrictions * doing like you said: over the long untrusted BTW: are you aware that the key itself is from verisign? the will not give microsoft unlimited keys for free the whole "secure boot" idea is crap
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
