On 07/07/2012 03:51 PM, suvayu ali wrote: > > I am more worried about "free" as in freedom. I don't quite grasp the > implications as an end user. For example consider the following > scenarios. > > Can I freely choose to use proprietary (or for that matter alternative > free) drivers for my hardware from whatever source I prefer? On x86 systems, the ability to disable secure boot is mandated by Microsoft and needed to debug Microsoft drivers and since all the hardware manufacturers want to comply to this specification, you can be rest assured they will provide this functionality and once you disable secure boot (instructions for this will likely be in a Fedora wiki page), then you are free to load up any custom kernel/kernel module of your choice. Also Fedora will provide the tools that the project itself uses within the official repository (ie) will be free and open source and instructions to use your own key in custom mode. On ARM systems that follow the MS specification, there is no such ability to disable secure boot and such locked down devices will simply be not supported by Fedora at all. We have plenty of other ARM systems that will be since Linux ecosystem in ARM is strong, it isn't a immediate concern. Rahul -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
