On 06/29/2012 09:15 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 29.06.2012 22:05, schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930: >>> how comes? my systems are working since many years >>> on many many fedora setups and a local repo was never >>> a solution for anything >> Well that doesn't mean it never will be, does it? > it will never be a solution in case of the OP's problem > >> I use a shared local repo on my LAN so I can update multiple machines >> without downloading the same RPMs multiple times. > this is a different topic > > i have installed a local cache-repo in my compamny many years ago > on a dediacted build/update/admin-VM and all other machines have only > this machine as package-source, but as said: this has nothing to do > with the OP's problem > >>>> the method I outlined worked for me on both Fedora 16 and Fedora 17 >>> which does not mean that the overhead of your method >>> has any benefit >> Have you even tried it? > my god why should i try to put rpmfusion repo-packages > ina local one for a one-shot install? > >>> again: how comes that you think i have any sproblem? >> You do have a problem, an invalid url in a yum configuration for >> RPMFusion when trying to configure using the supplied >> setup RPM > jesus christ I HAVE NO SINGLE PROBLEM > teh OP has a problem and your suggestion is no solution for him > >> How does a local repo qualify has snakeoil? You appear to be quick to >> dismiss it for what I consider very flimsy reasoning that in reality >> amounts to your preferred methods. >> >> From what I can gather that failed url came about by using yum and the >> RPM supplied by RPMFusion > how would put the rpmudison package sin a local repo > change them? > >> It is certainly possible the RPM you downloaded has been corrupted, and >> if it was a problem from RPMFusion I think many more people would > and how would a local-repo as you suggestet where > you put the corrupted files in change this? > > >> Well, all the best, and I hope you resolve the problem, and better still >> discover what caused it. > again: you should read more careful who is repsonding what to > you and who has problems or not :-) > > > I make no apologies for trying to help, but it appears to be a futile experience in this case. You are entitled to your opinion, as you are entirely convinced that you have made yourself clear, well if that was so, how come I have misunderstood the purpose of your post? More to the point you make a post, apparently already knowing the answer, which does seem rather pointless to me. But given we appear to talking at cross purposes I doubt you will agree, or perhaps even understand. cpp4ever -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
