Am 29.06.2012 15:53, schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930: > On 06/29/2012 02:31 PM, Mark Haney wrote: >> I've googled this a couple of times, but can't seem to find a straight answer on this problem. I installed the >> rpmfusion repos both with the GUI and from the CLI and I get this same problem, 'Cannot find valid baseurl'. >> >> Any ideas? >> > > The following is my recommendation for installing RPMs not available in your currently > available repositories. > > I downloaded the 2 setup RPMs from the RPMFusion website, then using createrepo I created my own repository, and > the required yum config file in /etc/yum.repos.d, (root privileges required) > > local.repo > > [MyRepo] > name=Local repo Fedora upgrade $releasever > baseurl=file:/home/user/MyRepo/RPMs$releasever/ > enabled=0 > gpgcheck=0 > > > The above configures the local repository for Fedora 17 should be in directory > > /home/user/MyRep/RPMs17 > > Then using yumex, enabling the local repo I selected the RPMFusion config RPMs for installation, > and then apply. You will then find an updated RPMFusion config RPM that needs to be updated. > After that RPMFusion should be up and working FIRST: pelase get rid of HTML messages on mailing-lists especially whith 20px letters! where is any single benfit in creating a local repo to put the one-shot RPMs compared between "yum install localfile.rpm" or "yum install --nogpgcheck localfile.rpm" ???? there is no difference from any point of view
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
